On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
> From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The lower-level driver may want to provide its own buffers. If so,
> there's no need to allocate new ones. This already happens to work
> just fine (since we check for size of 0 and use devm allocation), but
> it's good to document it.
>
> [dianders: Resolved conflicts; documented that no code changes needed
> on mainline]
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2: None
>
> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> index 7e9fe6e..2ee3190 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ struct cros_ec_msg {
> * We use this alignment to keep ARM and x86 happy. Probably word
> * alignment would be OK, there might be a small performance advantage
> * to using dword.
> - * @din_size: size of din buffer
> - * @dout_size: size of dout buffer
> + * @din_size: size of din buffer to allocate (zero to use static din)
> + * @dout_size: size of dout buffer to allocate (zero to use static dout)
> * @command_send: send a command
> * @command_recv: receive a command
> * @ec_name: name of EC device (e.g. 'chromeos-ec')
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
