Hi Tomasz,
On 06/18/2014 05:37 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC
>> need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250
>> has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control
>> special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
>> };
>>
>> adc: adc@126C0000 {
>> - compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2";
>> reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>> interrupts = <0 137 0>;
>> - clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
>> + clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";
>
> So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while
> the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this.
OK, I'll fix it by using 'sclk_adc' clock name.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
