Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix ftrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/16/2014 06:40 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Daniel,

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:30 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:

In (93bfb76 clocksource: exynos_mct: register sched_clock callback) we
supported using the MCT as a scheduler clock.  We properly marked
exynos4_read_sched_clock() as notrace.  However, we then went and
called another function that _wasn't_ notrace.  That means if you do:

    cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
    echo function_graph > current_tracer

You'll get a crash.

Fix this (but still let other readers of the MCT be trace-enabled) by
adding an extra function.  It's important to keep other users of MCT
traceable because the MCT is actually quite slow.



Hi Doug,

could you elaborate ? I don't get the 'because the MCT ... slow'

Sorry, I was trying to avoid duplication in the series and it's more
obvious when you look at parts 2 and 3 of the series.  ;)

Doing the math (please correct any miscalculations) using the numbers
from the other patches: You can see that the existing code takes
1323852 us for 1000000 gettimeofday in userspace.  The fastest
implementation (just shaving to a 32-bit timer) gets us as fast as
~1000000 us for 1000000 gettimeofday in userspace.

 From profiling, I believe that gettimeofday from userspace is about
50% overhead (system call, multiplication, copies, etc) and about 50%
MCT read.  That means that the fastest you can possibly do an MCT read
is in .5us or 500ns.

I believe an A15 has something like 1 or 2 cycles per instruction.  If
it were 2 cycles per instruction, it can execute a normal instruction
on a 2GHz machine in .5ns.  That means we can execute 1000 normal
instructions in the time it takes to do a since MCT access.

...so I guess that's what I'd call slow.  ;)  What do you think?  I
know that the MCT read shows up in whole system profiles of
gettimeofday.

Hi Dough,

thanks for the explanation. I still don't get why it is important to keep others users of mct traceable because it is quite slow ? May be it is what you explained here, but I miss the connection between 'the other users' <-> 'traceable' <-> 'because slow'.

--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux