Hello Krzysztof, > On 10/06/2014, at 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On pon, 2014-06-09 at 09:04 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Krzystof, >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On pon, 2014-06-09 at 11:37 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>>> MAX77802 is a PMIC that contains 10 high efficiency Buck regulators, >>>> 32 Low-dropout (LDO) regulators, two 32kHz buffered clock outputs, >>>> a Real-Time-Clock (RTC) and a I2C interface to program the individual >>>> regulators, clocks and the RTC. >>>> >>>> This series are based on drivers added by Simon Glass to the Chrome OS >>>> kernel and adds support for the Maxim 77802 Power Management IC, their >>>> regulators, clocks, RTC and I2C interface. It is composed of patches: >>>> >>>> [PATCH 1/5] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC >>>> [PATCH 2/5] regulator: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC regulators >>>> [PATCH 3/5] clk: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC clocks >>>> [PATCH 4/5] rtc: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC Real-Time-Clock >>>> [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add max77802 device node for exynos5420-peach-pit >>>> >>>> Patches 1-4 add support for the different devices and Patch 5 enables >>>> the MAX77802 PMIC on the Exynos5420 based Peach pit board. >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The main mfd, mfd irq, clk and rtc drivers look very similar to max77686 >>> drivers. I haven't checked other Maxim drivers but I think there will be >>> a lot of similarities with them also. It is almost common for Maxim >>> chipsets to share components between each other. >>> >>> I think there is no need in duplicating all that stuff once again in new >>> driver for another Maxim-almost-the-same-as-others-XYZ chipset. Just >>> merge it with max77686 (or other better candidate). >>> >>> The only difference is in regulator driver. I am not sure whether this >>> is a result of differences in chip or differences in driver design. >> >> Yes, we thought the same thing when we added support for the max77802 >> in the ChromeOS tree. Unfortunately it didn't work out half as well >> as we thought it would. When Javier was asking advice about sending >> things upstream we suggested that perhaps he should split the two up. >> >> >> You can see the result of the combined driver the ChromeOS tree (the >> code there is older, probably misnamed as max77xxx, and doesn't have >> the proper clock pieces, but you can get the gist): >> >> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/regulator/max77xxx-regulator.c >> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77xxx.c >> >> >> Specific problems that made it ugly to have a combined driver: >> >> * The RTC has many subtle differences between the 77686 and 77802. >> They expanded it to handle a 200 year timeframe instead of 100 and >> that meant that they had to shuffle the bits around everywhere. They >> also moved it to have the same i2c address as the main PMIC so all >> addresses are different (see max77686_map in the RTC link above). > > The difference in RTC registers seems the biggest but it can be solved > in readable manner. I see other differences but there aren't many. It > just hurts seeing so much code duplication: > $ sed -e 's/max77686/max77802/g' -e 's/MAX77686/MAX77802/g' \ > -i drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c > $ diff -ubB drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c drivers/rtc/rtc-max77802.c > > The combined RTC driver from ChromeOS seems fine to me... but I do not > insist. > >> * The regulator itself has similar concepts between the two, but the >> list of bucks / ldos and how they behave is quite different. Trying >> to understand the complex tables in >> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/regulator/max77xxx-regulator.c> >> was not easy. >> >> >> If we really need to write a single driver it certainly can be done, >> but please look at the above to be sure this is what you want. > > Sure, I don't stick to the idea of one merged driver where this > increases code size and complexity. I see your point that merging > regulator drivers won't bring benefits but please: > $ sed -e 's/max77686/max77802/g' -e 's/MAX77686/MAX77802/g' \ > -i drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c > $ diff -ubB drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c drivers/clk/clk-max77802.c > I agree that there is too much duplicated code between those two and others Maxim PMIC drivers. I also agree that at some point we have to stop duplicating code and clean up all this. So, I think that instead of trying to make a single driver support two similar but different PMIC I can factor out the generic code in a max-core driver so the PMIC specific code is small and well contained. I'll work on that and post a v2. Thanks a lot for your feedback and best regards, Javier > The difference in number of clocks (2 vs 3) is not an obstacle here. > > The same applies to main MFD driver and IRQ code. However MAX77686 > doesn't use regmap_irq_chip so it needs changes before merging the IRQ > code into one piece. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >> >> NOTE: it's possible that things could be more sane with more driver >> redesign, possibly making things more data driven. The thing that >> would be really nice to do would be to avoid all of the crazy >> "regulator_zzz_desc_zzz" macros, maybe? I'd have to actually try >> doing it to be sure it's cleaner, though... >> >> >> -Doug > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |