On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:55:03PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, I was specifically thinking about the various iPAQ specific things > > like the additional platform specific ATAGs that they invented with > > zero reference to mainline, and then expected them to be accepted as-is. > > > > I gave them a very clear message over that (which was "no way") and that > > was essentially the last of their mainline submissions. > > That's basically what I'm saying. They were too lazy to fix their code. > But nothing prevented that otherwise. They certainly couldn't use the > "firmware is broken and too hard to update" excuse. No, they just continued to use those ATAGs that they invented. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |