On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:31:15 PM Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Changes since v5:
> - Fixes for checkpatch warnings with --strict option as suggested by
> Nishanth Menon.
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Code improvements suggested by Viresh Kumar.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Minor changes as suggested in the last version.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Reworked based on the "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP
> layer" patch series posted by Nishanth Menon.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Boost mode frequencies are specfied as a set of frequencies instead of
> specifying them as OPPs. Thanks to Nishanth, Lukasz and Rob for the
> feedback.
>
> This series has been acked by authors and maintainers of the code
> portions changed in this series. The new DT binding introduced in this
> patch needs an ack from device tree binding maintainers as well.
>
> Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds
> support for CPU boost mode for CPUfreq drivers. To use the new boost
> mode, CPUfreq drivers have to specify the boost mode frequency and
> voltage within the CPUfreq driver, which is the case for Exynos4x12
> CPUfreq driver.
>
> But for CPUfreq drivers which obtain the OPPs from cpus node, this
> patch series adds support to specify boost mode frequencies in the
> cpu device tree node. This requirement came up when Lukasz pointed
> out the regression caused by the Exynos CPUfreq driver consolidation
> patches.
Both patches queued up for 3.16 in the linux-pm tree.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
