Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:11:54AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> The following changes since commit d7067f1c5fa0232001502569c6878d22308da268: > >> > >> devicetree: bindings: document SYSRAM binding (2014-05-15 03:30:29 +0900) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > >> tags/exynos-mcpm > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to ccf5511797cd4b48d20a85fa1778f5608eac9fd7: > >> > >> ARM: EXYNOS: Add MCPM call-back functions (2014-05-16 04:26:30 +0900) > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Exynos MCPM support for v3.16 > >> > >> - adding MCPM backend support for SMP secondary boot and core switching > >> on Samsung's Exynos5420. > >> > >> Tested on exynos5420-smdk5420 and exynos5420 based chromebook (peach-pit) > >> using the "/dev/b.L_switcher" user interface. Secondary core boot-up has > >> also been tested on both the boards. > > > > This goes with new SoC enablement as well; we'll merge it after multi-platform. > > Merged now, since multiplatform is going in as well. > > What confused me for a while here was that this branch was based on a > partial version of the DT branch, but it didn't match any of the Yeah, I just thought that it would be better if this could be having minimally the dependent patches. > branch heads we had merged in. It's not wrong to do so but it's useful > to get a heads up in the pull request. > OK, I see. I will do as you suggested in future. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |