Re: [PATCH V4] max8925_power: Use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" for DT code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dmitry,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Manish Badarkhe
<badarkhe.manish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Manish Badarkhe
> <badarkhe.manish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Instead of "#ifdef CONFIG_OF" use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)"
>> option for DT code to avoid if-deffery in code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since V1:
>> 1.Updated code to use "IS_ENABLED" during retrieval
>>   of platform/DT data.
>>
>> Changes since V2:
>> 1.Updated code as per Dmitry's comment to give preferance to
>>   platform data.
>>
>> Changes since V3:
>> 1.Updated code to use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" to remove
>>   DT data retrieval function during compilation itself
>>   when CONFIG_OF option is not set.
>>
>> :100644 100644 b4513f2... a7482db... M  drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>>  drivers/power/max8925_power.c |   17 +++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> index b4513f2..a7482db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> @@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int max8925_deinit_charger(struct max8925_power_info *info)
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>  static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>>  max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> @@ -440,9 +439,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         int no_insert_detect;
>>         struct max8925_power_pdata *pdata;
>>
>> -       if (!nproot)
>> -               return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -
>>         np = of_find_node_by_name(nproot, "charger");
>>         if (!np) {
>>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find charger node\n");
>> @@ -468,13 +464,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>         return pdata;
>>  }
>> -#else
>> -static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>> -max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> -{
>> -       return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>>
>>  static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> @@ -483,7 +472,11 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct max8925_power_info *info;
>>         int ret;
>>
>> -       pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
>> +       pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !pdata && chip->dev->of_node)
>> +               pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
>> +
>>         if (!pdata) {
>>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform data isn't assigned to "
>>                         "power supply\n");
>
> Gentle ping!!
> Please let me know, are there any review comments on this patch?

Gentle ping!!

Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux