Sorry, only now catch it! I agree, this patch is not needed anymore, except Kconfig option. config SOC_EXYNOS5410 is needed to build clock stuff. What is your opinion, Tomasz? On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Tomazs, > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Tarek, >> >> With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1], >> this patch can be skipped. >> >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html >> >> Best regards, >> Tomasz >> >> On 23.05.2014 12:35, Tarek Dakhran wrote: > [snip] >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> index 739bdc8..971baf0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr) >>> >>> boot_reg = sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x1c; >>> >>> - if (!soc_is_exynos4212()) >>> + if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos5410()) >>> boot_reg += 4*cpu; >>> >>> __raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg); >>> > > I need to define SoC type to set correct bootreg in firmware, > otherwise only one cpu can be booted. > So, this stuff is needed. > > Best regards, > Tarek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |