On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Checks for CONFIG_EXYNOS_ASV were added in v3.3. But the related Kconfig
> symbol has never been added to the tree. Remove these checks, as they
> always evaluate to false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for pointing this out.
ASV was supposed to be merged, but it appears it failed or never attempted.
I will merge with the next batch (this week).
Cheers,
MyungJoo.
> ---
> 0) Untested.
>
> 1) I do not really care much for this patch. Two years is not very long
> for dead code to remain in the tree. There is, however, a trivial issue
> that makes this patch stand out from the other patches in my current
> sweep of the tree for Kconfig related problems.
>
> See, here the use of an unknown Kconfig macro hides an obvious typo: it
> should either be "exynos_result_of_asv" or "exynos4_result_of_asv", but
> not both. Ie, this almost certainly wouldn't have compiled even if the
> Kconfig symbol EXYNOS_ASV would have been part of the tree.
>
> 2) So this makes me wonder whether there are any guidelines for using
> Kconfig macros before the related Kconfig symbols are merged?
>
> drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 3 +--
> drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 13 -------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)ÿ淸º{.nÇ+돴윯돪†+%듚ÿ깁負¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+돴¥Š{깸튐꿴筬Ê þ)í끾èw* jgП¨ ¶‰šŽ듶¢jÿ¾?G«앶ÿ◀ ◁¦j:+v돣ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ ? ®w?듺þf＂·hš뤴얎ÿ녪¥
