On 05/22/2014 08:35 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 04/26/14 20:05, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 14.04.2014 11:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Hi Kukjin,
I believe I addressed all the comments. Is it possible to take this
patchset for next ?
Sure ;-)
+1.
Also when applying you might add
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
to any patches that don't have it yet.
Tomasz, thanks for your review.
I will take this series, "moving exynos-cpuidle into drivers/cpuidle"
into samsung tree if Rafael is OK on that.
Daniel,
Can you please check/test the functionality your series with using my
for-next because there were merge conflicts with mcpm-exynos stuff...?
Sure, will do that tomorrow.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
