On 5/15/14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:47:40 AM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> Hello Bartlomiej,
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> wrote:
>> > Remove runtime checks for pdata sanity from exynos_tmu_initialize().
>> > The current values hardcoded in pdata will never trigger the checks
>> > and for the new code potential mistakes should be caught during
>> > development/review phases.
>> >
>> > There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.h | 1 -
>> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 13 -------------
>> > 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.h
>> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.h
>> > index 3eb2ed9..cd44719 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.h
>> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
>> > #define SENSOR_NAME_LEN 16
>> > #define MAX_TRIP_COUNT 8
>> > #define MAX_COOLING_DEVICE 4
>> > -#define MAX_THRESHOLD_LEVS 5
>> >
>> > #define ACTIVE_INTERVAL 500
>> > #define IDLE_INTERVAL 10000
>> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> > index 903566f..789d745 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> > @@ -158,23 +158,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct
>> > platform_device *pdev)
>> > data->temp_error > pdata->max_efuse_value)
>> > data->temp_error = pdata->efuse_value & EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
>> >
>> > - if (pdata->max_trigger_level > MAX_THRESHOLD_LEVS) {
>> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid max trigger level\n");
>> > - ret = -EINVAL;
>> > - goto out;
>> > - }
>> > -
>> > for (i = 0; i < pdata->max_trigger_level; i++) {
>> > if (!pdata->trigger_levels[i])
>> > continue;
>> >
>> > - if ((pdata->trigger_type[i] == HW_TRIP) &&
>> > - (!pdata->trigger_levels[pdata->max_trigger_level - 1])) {
>> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid hw trigger level\n");
>> > - ret = -EINVAL;
>> > - goto out;
>> > - }
>> > -
>>
>> Does it mean no new pdata are going to be written? i.e., no new soc is
>> going to be supported by this driver that needs proper pdata checking?
>
> This is not a proper checking. The checks in question are done at runtime
> in a production code for data that is hardcoded inside driver during
> development time and later it doesn't change. Such data should be verified
> during development and review time (i.e. by a script parsing relevant data
> from exynos_tmu_data.c, one can also argue that verification to be done is
> so simple that the review by a maintainer should be enough).
Agreed to your arguments. These changes looks fine.
>
>> > /* Count trigger levels except the HW trip*/
>> > if (!(pdata->trigger_type[i] == HW_TRIP))
>> > trigger_levs++;
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
