On 16.05.2014 07:07, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Abhilash, >> >> On 13.05.2014 14:01, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >>> Rebased on >>> 1] Kukjin Kim's tree for-next branch (which has Sachin Kamat's SYSRAM >>> patches merged) with Tomasz Figa's samsung clock tree (samsung-next branch) >>> merged. >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next >>> 2] Pankaj Dubey's v4 PMU patchset >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/10/29 >> >> I think this patch is not safe to base on yet. I need to find time to >> review the latest version and share my latest view on this with Pankaj, >> as I have a bit different design in mind. > OK, do you think the PMU series might make it this cycle or should I > drop this as a dependency and re-base my patches just on Daniel's > CPUIdle consolidation. I'd say it's too late for 3.16 already, for the PMU series at least. 3.15-rc6 will probably show up in next days and Kukjin still has to send pull requests to ARM-SoC, so I'd defer this series for 3.17 as well, especially considering the fact that extending the PMU code in its current form already met with opposition. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |