On 05/17/14 08:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, May 16, 2014 07:54:01 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
Jonghwan Choi wrote:
Commit 7da83a80 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate Exynos specific macros from plat to
mach") which lands in samsung tree causes build breakage
for cpufreq-exynos like following:
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos_cpufreq_probe':
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'soc_is_exynos4210'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'soc_is_exynos4412'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:170:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'soc_is_exynos5250'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos4x12_set_clkdiv':
drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c:118:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2
This fixes above error with getting SoC information via
of_machine_is_compatible() instead of soc_is_exynosXXXX().
Probably,
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa ?
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi<jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks better.
Rafael, if you have no objection on this, shall I pick this into samsung
tree for 3.16 because of the current build breakage with enabling exynos
cpufreq?
Please go ahead.
Done.
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
