Hi Kamil, On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Arun, > > I asked you to put old and new v6 firmware in separate files. But wont that require a different filename other than s5p-mfc-v6.fw? But the driver still expects the same file name. Can I put the new filename as s5p-mfc-v6-v2.fw and mention in the README that the file has to be renamed to s5p-mfc-v6.fw to be used? > You should also mention in the commit message that this new firmware > will not work with the s5p-mfc driver without the patch you recently > submitted to linux-media mailing list. Please also add a link to the > thread with the necessary patch. Ok will do that. > > In addition to the above I think a readme/description file should be > added to the s5p-mfc folder. The issue of firmware for v6 should be > explained, so that no one is surprised that something does not work. > Ok. Regards Arun > Best wishes, > -- > Kamil Debski > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunkk.samsung@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arun >> Kumar K >> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:45 AM >> To: dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung- >> soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx; arunkk.samsung@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] s5p-mfc: Update mfc-v6 firmware >> >> This is the newer version of s5p-mfc-v6.fw with many >> fixes and enhancements. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> s5p-mfc/s5p-mfc-v6.fw | Bin 306312 -> 343756 bytes >> 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/s5p-mfc/s5p-mfc-v6.fw b/s5p-mfc/s5p-mfc-v6.fw >> index >> 2e1179fa6d227f1c5a23f78b4834be336e579f50..9d3345fbf4abb7ea7389816916d68 >> 57d64732380 100644 >> GIT binary patch >> literal 343756 > > [snip] > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |