On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:28:12PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > And more thing, we would need to consider image enhancer device placed > > between crtc and connector/encoder devices. And it'd better to rename > > drm_hw_block to drm_bridge, and existing drm_bridge relevant codes > > should be removed. > > I don't object to changing the name to hw_block or something else. > Although to avoid introducing too much confusion in this discussion, > for now I am calling it bridge/drm_bridge_funcs/etc for now ;-) FWIW, I think the name drm_bridge is fine. It describes a device that takes a video signal as an input and outputs a video signal, possibly using a different encoding. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpMszbnj9_Wy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
