<Gentle PING> On 7 May 2014 21:03, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [CCing more DT-folks :)] > > On 07.05.2014 16:19, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>>> On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>>>>>> Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent >>>>>>> of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-phy" and provide Reg >>>>>>> and Bit through phy provider node. This way we can avoid SoC specific >>>>>>> hardcoding in phy driver and don't need to look into dt bindings for >>>>>>> each new SoC. >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe it is a not recommended approach. >>>>> >>>>> Why not? We should try to avoid hard coding in the driver code. Moreover by >>>>> avoiding hardcoding we can make it a generic driver for single bit PHYs. >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1. >>>> >>>> @Tomasz, any plans to consider this approach for simple phy driver? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Rahul Sharma. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Rahul, >>> Initially, I wanted to make a very generic driver and to add bit and >>> register (or its offset) attribute to the PHY node. >>> However, there was a very strong opposition from DT maintainers >>> to adding any bit related configuration to DT. >>> The current solution was designed to be a trade-off between >>> being generic and being accepted :). >>> >> >> Thanks Tomasz, >> Ok got it. lets discuss it again and conclude it. >> >> @Kishon, DT-folks, >> >> The original RFC patch from Tomasz (at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/21/313) >> added simple phy driver as "Generic-simple-phy" with these properties: >> >> + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mask", &sphy->mask); >> + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "on-value", &sphy->on_value); >> + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "off-value", &sphy->off_value); >> >> Shall we consider the same solution again for generic simple phy >> driver which just expose on/off control through register bit. >> >> Regards, >> Rahul Sharma >> >>> Regards, >>> Tomasz Stanislawski >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Kishon >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dri-devel mailing list >>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > Best regards, > Tomasz > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |