On 05/09/14 13:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Kukjin,
Hi Tomasz,
On 09.05.2014 04:14, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Sachin,
On 08.05.2014 06:16, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Instead of hardcoding the SYSRAM details for each SoC,
pass this information through device tree (DT) and make
the code SoC agnostic. Generic SRAM bindings are used
for achieving this.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2.
* Updated sysram node for Universal C210 board - Thanks to
Tomasz Figa for testing and updating the same.
* Added error handling code.
* Break if matching node found.
* Remove unnecessary error messages.
This patch is based on linux next (next-20140501) on top of
my Kconfig consolidation patch
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/28642
Tested on 4210/4412 Origen, 5250/5420 Arndale and SMDK5420 boards.
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 15 ++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 18 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi | 18 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 18 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 18 +++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 64
----------------------
-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 8 ++-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 7 ---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 56
++++++++++++++++++--
11 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
Looks good, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me but I think, we need to change the name of 'sram'
because
it can cause some confusing, actually it is not matching _real_ sram
area on
the SoCs. When we upstreamed regarding patch, I decided the name to use
'SYSRAM', it was called another name in datasheet though. So, I'd like to
use 'sysram' instead of 'sram' as we used before.
I will change the name when I apply this series in this weekend, if
you guys
have no objection.
You mean s/sram/sysram/ in compatible strings of Exynos-specific
reserved areas? If yes, I'm fine, it might be even better. Just remember
to update documentation in patch 2/2 as well.
Yes, of course ;-)
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
