Hi Vivek, On 05.05.2014 07:02, Vivek Gautam wrote: > From: Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add the phy provider, supplied by new Exynos-usb2phy using > Generic phy framework. > Keeping the support for older USB phy intact right now, in order > to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant > device tree side change for ehci-exynos. > Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ehci, we can > remove the support for older phys. > > Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Addressed review comments from mailing list] > [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Kept the code for old usb-phy, and just > added support for new exynos5-usb2phy in generic phy framework] > [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Edited the commit message] > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes from v11: > - Removed setting phy explicitly to error pointer. > - Changed error check to '-ENOSYS' instead of '-ENXIO' in failure case of > devm_of_phy_get(). > > Changes from v10: > - Removed 'phy-names' property from the bindings since we don't need it. > - Restructured exynos_ehci_get_phy() function to handle error codes as > well as return relevant error codes effectively. > - Added IS_ERR() check for PHYs in exynos_ehci_phy_enable()/disable(). > > Changes from v9: > - Calling usb_phy_shutdown() when exynos_ehci_phy_enable() is failing. > - Made exynos_ehci_phy_disable() return void, since its return value > did not serve any purpose. > - Calling clk_disable_unprepare() in exynos_ehci_resume() when > exynos_ehci_phy_enable() is failed. > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt | 15 +++ > drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |