On 08.05.2014 19:04, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On most platforms GIC registers are banked, so each CPU can access its >> registers at the same address. However there is a small number of SoCs >> on which the banking is not implemented and each CPU has its GIC >> register set at different offset from GIC base address. >> >> Originally the driver used simple maths to calculate the address, i.e. >> multiplying constant percpu_offset by cpu_logical_map(cpu). However this >> assumed the namespace of cpu_logical_map() to be from 0 to num_cpus-1, >> but if CPU topology is specified via DT, this changes to full ID in >> the same format as MPIDR register and thus breaks the assumption. >> >> This patch adds support for per CPU GIC bank offset specification >> through device tree to separate SoC-internal core wiring from CPU >> multi-processor IDs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 7 ++ >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 34 +++++++++- >> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++-------- >> 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> index 333f4ae..47654e6 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> @@ -209,6 +209,13 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. >> Value type: <phandle> >> Definition: Specifies the ACC[2] node associated with this CPU. >> >> + - gic-offset >> + Usage: required for systems that have non-banked GIC >> + implementation that requires each CPU to use different >> + offset to access its set of GIC registers >> + Value type: <u32> >> + Definition: Specifies the offset of GIC registers specific to >> + this CPU. > > What if you have 1 distributor address and a per cpu address which is > allowed in the gicv2 spec IIRC. Hmm, I need to take a look at GIC v2 spec... but I think my proposed binding would still cover this, as the implementation (if modified to support this) would simply ignore the offset for distributor in this case. > > I think I would rather see this stay contained within the gic node and > use reg property. How do we match reg entries with CPUs then? The first idea that comes to my mind would be adding arm,cpu-map property that would list MPIDR values of CPUs in the same order as register banks are listed in reg property but I'm not sure this is a good idea. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |