Dear Kukjin, Could you please pick this patch? Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi On 04/29/2014 10:37 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of smc call > of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes from v4: > - Post only this patch separated from following patchset[1] > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/873 > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c > index 932129e..aa01c42 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > > #include <mach/map.h> > > +#include <plat/cpu.h> > + > #include "smc.h" > > static int exynos_do_idle(void) > @@ -28,13 +30,24 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void) > > static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu) > { > + /* > + * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id. > + * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter > + * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id. > + */ > + if (soc_is_exynos4212()) > + cpu = 0; > + > exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0); > return 0; > } > > static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr) > { > - void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu; > + void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c; > + > + if (!soc_is_exynos4212()) > + boot_reg += 4*cpu; > > __raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg); > return 0; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |