On Thursday, May 01, 2014 7:06 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:34:05AM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote: > > This patch adds memory layout and translation lookup information about > > 48-bit address space with 4K pages. The description is based on 4 > > levels of translation tables. > > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <sungjinn.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/arm64/memory.txt | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/memory.txt > > b/Documentation/arm64/memory.txt index d50fa61..8142709 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/arm64/memory.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/memory.txt > > @@ -8,10 +8,11 @@ This document describes the virtual memory layout > > used by the AArch64 Linux kernel. The architecture allows up to 4 > > levels of translation tables with a 4KB page size and up to 3 levels with a 64KB page size. > > > > -AArch64 Linux uses 3 levels of translation tables with the 4KB page > > -configuration, allowing 39-bit (512GB) virtual addresses for both > > user -and kernel. With 64KB pages, only 2 levels of translation tables > > are -used but the memory layout is the same. > > +AArch64 Linux uses 3 levels and 4 levels of translation tables with > > uses either 3 or 4 levels of translation? Yes, you are right. I will fix it. > > +the 4KB page configuration, allowing 39-bit (512GB) and 48-bit > > +(256TB) virtual addresses, respectively, for both user and kernel. > > +With 64KB pages, only 2 levels of translation tables are used but the > > +memory layout is the same. > > Perhaps it's worth clarifying that with 64KB and 2 levels of translation tables we are limited to a > 42-bit address space here. Okay, I will add it. > > > > User addresses have bits 63:39 set to 0 while the kernel addresses > > have the same bits set to 1. TTBRx selection is given by bit 63 of > > the @@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ The swapper_pgd_dir address is written to TTBR1 > > and never written to TTBR0. > > > > > > -AArch64 Linux memory layout with 4KB pages: > > +AArch64 Linux memory layout with 4KB pages + 3 levels: > > > > Start End Size Use > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > @@ -48,7 +49,34 @@ ffffffbffc000000 ffffffbfffffffff 64MB modules > > ffffffc000000000 ffffffffffffffff 256GB kernel logical memory map > > > > > > -AArch64 Linux memory layout with 64KB pages: > > +AArch64 Linux memory layout with 4KB pages + 4 levels: > > + > > +Start End Size Use > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > +0000000000000000 0000ffffffffffff 256TB user > > + > > +ffff000000000000 ffff7bfffffeffff ~124TB vmalloc > > + > > +ffff7bffffff0000 ffff7bffffffffff 64KB [guard page] > > + > > +ffff7c0000000000 ffff7dffffffffff 2TB vmemmap > > + > > +ffff7e0000000000 ffff7ffffbbfffff ~2TB [guard, future vmmemap] > > hmm, I may be completely confused, but if VMALLOC_END is defined to be (PAGE_OFFSET - UL(0x400000000) > - SZ_64K), how can we squeeze ~4TB into a 16 GB hole? In the 5th patch, VMALLOC_END is changed to (PAGE_OFFSET - UL(0x40000000000) - SZ_64K) when 4 level is set. > > + > > +ffff7ffffa000000 ffff7ffffaffffff 16MB PCI I/O space > > + > > +ffff7ffffb000000 ffff7ffffbbfffff 12MB [guard] > > + > > +ffff7ffffbc00000 ffff7ffffbdfffff 2MB earlyprintk device > > shouldn't this be "fixed mappings" now? Thanks!! I will fix it. Best Regards Jungseok Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |