Hi Sachin, On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Arun, > > On 30 April 2014 11:15, Arun Kumar K <arunkk.samsung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Sachin, >> >> Thank you for the review. >> >> >> On 04/29/14 22:45, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> >>> Hi Arun, >>> >>> On 23 April 2014 18:27, Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Kiran AVND <avnd.kiran@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This patch adds variant data and core support for >>>> V8 decoder. This patch also adds the register definition >>>> file for new firmware version v8 for MFC. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kiran AVND <avnd.kiran@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak <posciak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>> >>> <...> >>>> >>>> + >>>> +/* Returned value register for specific setting */ >>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_RET_PICTURE_TAG_TOP_V8 0xf674 >>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_RET_PICTURE_TAG_BOT_V8 0xf678 >>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_MVC_VIEW_ID_V8 0xf6d8 >>>> + >>>> +/* SEI related information */ >>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_FRAME_PACK_SEI_AVAIL_V8 0xf6dc >>>> + >>>> +/* MFCv8 Context buffer sizes */ >>>> +#define MFC_CTX_BUF_SIZE_V8 (30 * SZ_1K) /* 30KB */ >>> >>> >>> Please include header file for size macros. >>> >> >> The file linux/sizes.h is included in regs-mfc-v6.h which >> inturn gets included in this file. Isnt that fine? > > Direct inclusions are encouraged. Please add it in this file. > Ok will add it. >> >> >>> <...> >>>> >>>> }; >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h >>>> b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h >>>> index 48a14b5..f0e63f5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h >>>> @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ >>>> #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h> >>>> #include <media/videobuf2-core.h> >>>> #include "regs-mfc.h" >>>> -#include "regs-mfc-v6.h" >>>> -#include "regs-mfc-v7.h" >>>> +#include "regs-mfc-v8.h" >>>> >>>> /* Definitions related to MFC memory */ >>>> >>>> @@ -705,5 +704,6 @@ void set_work_bit_irqsave(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx); >>>> #define IS_TWOPORT(dev) (dev->variant->port_num == 2 ? 1 >>>> : 0) >>>> #define IS_MFCV6_PLUS(dev) (dev->variant->version >= 0x60 ? 1 : 0) >>>> #define IS_MFCV7(dev) (dev->variant->version >= 0x70 ? 1 : 0) >>> >>> >>> Is MFC v8 superset of MFC v7? >>> >> >> Yes it is a superset. >> So the last patch in this series renames IS_MFCV7 to IS_MFCV7_PLUS. > > Shouldn't that be done first in that case? > Adding variants to access MFC registers patch actually removes lot of such IS_MFCV7 checks from opr_v6.c file. Thats why I put that patch as the last in the series to have minimal changes as possible. Regards Arun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |