After applying "PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead of
list_for_each_entry",
cpufreq table is sorted int descending order. So
exynos_sort_descend_freq_table
doesn't need anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 20 --------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index a6b8214..92db80b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -279,25 +279,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_cpufreq_irq(int irq, void
*id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void)
-{
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_tbl = dvfs_info->freq_table;
- int i = 0, index;
- unsigned int tmp_freq;
- /*
- * Exynos5440 clock controller state logic expects the cpufreq table
to
- * be in descending order. But the OPP library constructs the table
in
- * ascending order. So to make the table descending we just need to
- * swap the i element with the N - i element.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < dvfs_info->freq_count / 2; i++) {
- index = dvfs_info->freq_count - i - 1;
- tmp_freq = freq_tbl[i].frequency;
- freq_tbl[i].frequency = freq_tbl[index].frequency;
- freq_tbl[index].frequency = tmp_freq;
- }
-}
-
static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
policy->clk = dvfs_info->cpu_clk;
@@ -374,7 +355,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
goto err_put_node;
}
dvfs_info->freq_count = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dvfs_info->dev);
- exynos_sort_descend_freq_table();
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &dvfs_info->latency))
dvfs_info->latency = DEF_TRANS_LATENCY;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
