Re: [PATCH v5] clk: Exynos5250: Add clocks for G3D

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tomasz,
Thank you for the review.
Will address your comments and post the updated patch soon.

Regards
Arun

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
>
> On 24.04.2014 16:49, Arun Kumar K wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds the required clocks for ARM Mali IP
>> in Exynos5250.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> This patch somehow got missed getting merged long time
>> back after Acks by Mike and Kukjin and review done by
>> Tomasz and Doug.
>
>
> Sorry for this, I have obviously missed this patch. Feel free to ping me if
> you don't see a reply from me for some time (a week or two). There are large
> volumes of e-mails going through my mailbox and such small single patches
> can easily get lost. ;)
>
> Anyway, since this patch seems to have changed quite a bit since last
> version, please see my comments inline.
>
>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg21608.html
>> Resending it now after rebasing and testing on the latest kernel.
>>
>> Changes from v4
>> - Rebased on latest kernel
>> - Added macros
>> Changes from v3
>> - Renamed some clocks as per Tomasz Figa's comments
>> Changes from v2
>> - Rebased on clk-next
>> Changes from v1
>> - Removed exporting of parent DIV clock for g3d
>>    as per Tomsz Figa's comment.
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c   |   14 ++++++++++++++
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h |    2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
>> b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
>> index e7ee442..14a1d49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>   #define VPLL_CON0             0x10140
>>   #define GPLL_CON0             0x10150
>>   #define SRC_TOP0              0x10210
>> +#define SRC_TOP1               0x10214
>>   #define SRC_TOP2              0x10218
>>   #define SRC_TOP3              0x1021c
>>   #define SRC_GSCL              0x10220
>> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@
>>   #define GATE_IP_GSCL          0x10920
>>   #define GATE_IP_DISP1         0x10928
>>   #define GATE_IP_MFC           0x1092c
>> +#define GATE_IP_G3D            0x10930
>>   #define GATE_IP_GEN           0x10934
>>   #define GATE_IP_FSYS          0x10944
>>   #define GATE_IP_PERIC         0x10950
>> @@ -100,6 +102,7 @@ static unsigned long exynos5250_clk_regs[] __initdata
>> = {
>>         DIV_CPU0,
>>         SRC_CORE1,
>>         SRC_TOP0,
>> +       SRC_TOP1,
>>         SRC_TOP2,
>>         SRC_TOP3,
>>         SRC_GSCL,
>
>
> Shouldn't GATE_IP_G3D be added to the list as well?
>
>
>> @@ -189,10 +192,12 @@ PNAME(mout_vpllsrc_p)     = { "fin_pll",
>> "sclk_hdmi27m" };
>>   PNAME(mout_vpll_p)    = { "mout_vpllsrc", "fout_vpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_cpll_p)    = { "fin_pll", "fout_cpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_epll_p)    = { "fin_pll", "fout_epll" };
>> +PNAME(mout_gpll_p)     = { "fin_pll", "fout_gpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_mpll_user_p)       = { "fin_pll", "mout_mpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_bpll_user_p)       = { "fin_pll", "mout_bpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_aclk166_p) = { "mout_cpll", "mout_mpll_user" };
>>   PNAME(mout_aclk200_p) = { "mout_mpll_user", "mout_bpll_user" };
>> +PNAME(mout_aclk400_p)  = { "mout_aclk400_g3d_mid", "mout_gpll" };
>>   PNAME(mout_aclk200_sub_p) = { "fin_pll", "div_aclk200" };
>>   PNAME(mout_aclk266_sub_p) = { "fin_pll", "div_aclk266" };
>>   PNAME(mout_aclk333_sub_p) = { "fin_pll", "div_aclk333" };
>> @@ -273,12 +278,16 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock
>> exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk166", mout_aclk166_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mout_aclk200_p, SRC_TOP0, 12, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk333", mout_aclk166_p, SRC_TOP0, 16, 1),
>> +       MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_g3d_mid", mout_aclk200_p, SRC_TOP0, 20, 1),
>> +
>> +       MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_g3d", mout_aclk400_p, SRC_TOP1, 28, 1),
>>
>>         MUX(0, "mout_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_mpll_user", mout_mpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 20, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_bpll_user", mout_bpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 24, 1),
>> +       MUX(CLK_MOUT_GPLL, "mout_gpll", mout_gpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 28, 1),
>>
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk200_disp1_sub", mout_aclk200_sub_p, SRC_TOP3, 4,
>> 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk266_gscl_sub", mout_aclk266_sub_p, SRC_TOP3, 8,
>> 1),
>> @@ -326,6 +335,7 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[]
>> __initdata = {
>>
>>         MUX(0, "mout_mpll_fout", mout_mpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 4, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1),
>> +
>
>
> nit: Stray blank line.
>
>
>>   };
>>
>>   static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5250_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>> @@ -351,6 +361,8 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5250_div_clks[]
>> __initdata = {
>>         DIV(0, "div_aclk200", "mout_aclk200", DIV_TOP0, 12, 3),
>>         DIV(0, "div_aclk266", "mout_mpll_user", DIV_TOP0, 16, 3),
>>         DIV(0, "div_aclk333", "mout_aclk333", DIV_TOP0, 20, 3),
>> +       DIV(0, "div_aclk400_g3d", "mout_aclk400_g3d", DIV_TOP0,
>> +                                                       24, 3),
>>
>>         DIV(0, "div_aclk66_pre", "mout_mpll_user", DIV_TOP1, 24, 3),
>>
>> @@ -615,6 +627,8 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock
>> exynos5250_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         GATE(CLK_WDT, "wdt", "div_aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIS, 19, 0, 0),
>>         GATE(CLK_RTC, "rtc", "div_aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIS, 20, 0, 0),
>>         GATE(CLK_TMU, "tmu", "div_aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIS, 21, 0, 0),
>> +       GATE(CLK_G3D, "g3d", "div_aclk400_g3d", GATE_IP_G3D, 0,
>> +                                       CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
>
>
> Shouldn't this be sorted properly? The GATE_IP_G3D register is between
> GATE_IP_MFC and GATE_IP_GEN.
>
>
>>   };
>>
>>   static struct samsung_pll_rate_table vpll_24mhz_tbl[] __initdata = {
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
>> index 922f2dc..751915e 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
>> @@ -150,9 +150,11 @@
>>   #define CLK_G2D                       345
>>   #define CLK_MDMA0             346
>>   #define CLK_SMMU_MDMA0                347
>> +#define CLK_G3D                        348
>>
>>   /* mux clocks */
>>   #define CLK_MOUT_HDMI         1024
>> +#define CLK_MOUT_GPLL          1025
>>
>>   /* must be greater than maximal clock id */
>>   #define CLK_NR_CLKS           1025
>
>
> Since you have changed the maximum clock ID, by adding CLK_MOUT_GPLL, you
> should also update CLK_NR_CLKS.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux