> Nearly all of the registers in tps65090 combine control bits and > status bits. Turn off caching of all registers except the select few > that can be cached. > > In order to avoid adding more duplicate #defines, we also move some > register offset definitions to the mfd driver (and resolve > inconsistent names). > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: > - Leave cache on for the registers that can be cached. > - Move register offsets to mfd header file. > > drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c | 11 ----------- > include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c > index c3cddb4..1c3e6e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c > @@ -32,14 +32,6 @@ > #define NUM_INT_REG 2 > #define TOTAL_NUM_REG 0x18 > > -/* interrupt status registers */ > -#define TPS65090_INT_STS 0x0 > -#define TPS65090_INT_STS2 0x1 > - > -/* interrupt mask registers */ > -#define TPS65090_INT_MSK 0x2 > -#define TPS65090_INT_MSK2 0x3 > - > #define TPS65090_INT1_MASK_VAC_STATUS_CHANGE 1 > #define TPS65090_INT1_MASK_VSYS_STATUS_CHANGE 2 > #define TPS65090_INT1_MASK_BAT_STATUS_CHANGE 3 > @@ -144,17 +136,26 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip tps65090_irq_chip = { > .irqs = tps65090_irqs, > .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65090_irqs), > .num_regs = NUM_INT_REG, > - .status_base = TPS65090_INT_STS, > - .mask_base = TPS65090_INT_MSK, > + .status_base = TPS65090_REG_INTR_STS, > + .mask_base = TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK, > .mask_invert = true, > }; > > static bool is_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) > { > - if ((reg == TPS65090_INT_STS) || (reg == TPS65090_INT_STS2)) > - return true; > - else > + /* Nearly all registers have status bits mixed in, except a few */ > + switch (reg) { > + case TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK: > + case TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK2: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL0: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL1: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL2: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL3: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL4: > + case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL5: > return false; > + } > + return true; > } I'll not force the issue, but if you wanted to do this more succinctly you could also do: case TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK ... TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK: case TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL0 ... TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL5: or if (reg >= TPS65090_REG_INTR_MASK && reg <= TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL5) Ect. Otherwise patch looks fine: Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html