On wto, 2014-04-15 at 14:28 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 11:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On pią, 2014-03-28 at 14:06 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Fix stall after hotplugging CPU1. Affected are SoCs where Multi Core Timer
> >> interrupts are shared (SPI), e.g. Exynos 4210. The stall was a result of
> >> starting the CPU1 local timer not in L1 timer but in L0 (which is used
> >> by CPU0).
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you have any comments on these 3 patches? They fix the CPU stall on
> > Exynos4210 and also on Exynos3250 (Chanwoo Choi sent patches for it
> > recently).
>
> You describe this issue as impacting different SoC not only the exynos,
> right ?
>
> Do you know what other SoCs are impacted by this ?
No, affected are only Exynos SoC-s. It was confirmed on Exynos4210
(Trats board) and Exynos3250 (new SoC, patches for it were recently
posted by Chanwoo).
Other Exynos SoC-s where MCT local timers use shared interrupts (SPI)
can also be affected. Candidates are Exynos 5250 and 5420 but I haven't
tested them.
> I guess this issue is not reproducible just with the line below, we need
> a timer to expire right at the moment CPU1 is hotplugged, right ?
Right. The timer must fire in short time between enabling local timer
for CPU1 and setting the affinity for IRQ.
In my case on ~1 GHz 2 core CPU (during idle state, system booted with
init=/bin/sh) it was easily triggered with:
for i in `seq 200`; do
echo 0 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
echo 1 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
sleep 1
done
The stall happened typically after 10-30 seconds of such test.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> >> Trigger:
> >> $ echo 0 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online && echo 1 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
> >>
> >> Stall information:
> >> [ 530.045259] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> >> [ 530.045618] 1: (6 GPs behind) idle=6d0/0/0 softirq=369/369
> >> [ 530.050987] (detected by 0, t=6589 jiffies, g=33, c=32, q=0)
> >> [ 530.056721] Task dump for CPU 1:
> >> [ 530.059928] swapper/1 R running 0 0 1 0x00001000
> >> [ 530.066377] [<c0524e14>] (__schedule+0x414/0x9b4) from [<c00b6610>] (rcu_idle_enter+0x18/0x38)
> >> [ 530.074955] [<c00b6610>] (rcu_idle_enter+0x18/0x38) from [<c0079a18>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x3bc)
> >> [ 530.084069] [<c0079a18>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x3bc) from [<c0517d34>] (secondary_start_kernel+0x164/0x1a0)
> >> [ 530.094029] [<c0517d34>] (secondary_start_kernel+0x164/0x1a0) from [<40517244>] (0x40517244)
> >>
> >> The timers for CPU1 were missed:
> >> [ 591.668436] cpu: 1
> >> [ 591.670430] clock 0:
> >> [ 591.672691] .base: c0ab7750
> >> [ 591.676160] .index: 0
> >> [ 591.679025] .resolution: 1 nsecs
> >> [ 591.682404] .get_time: ktime_get
> >> [ 591.685970] .offset: 0 nsecs
> >> [ 591.689349] active timers:
> >> [ 591.692045] #0: <dfb51f40>, hrtimer_wakeup, S:01
> >> [ 591.696759] # expires at 454687834257-454687884257 nsecs [in -136770537232 to -136770487232 nsecs]
> >>
> >> And the event_handler for next event was wrong:
> >> [ 591.917120] Tick Device: mode: 1
> >> [ 591.920676] Per CPU device: 0
> >> [ 591.923621] Clock Event Device: mct_tick0
> >> [ 591.927623] max_delta_ns: 178956969027
> >> [ 591.931613] min_delta_ns: 1249
> >> [ 591.934913] mult: 51539608
> >> [ 591.938557] shift: 32
> >> [ 591.941681] mode: 3
> >> [ 591.944724] next_event: 595025000000 nsecs
> >> [ 591.949227] set_next_event: exynos4_tick_set_next_event
> >> [ 591.954522] set_mode: exynos4_tick_set_mode
> >> [ 591.959296] event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt
> >> [ 591.963730] retries: 0
> >> [ 591.966761]
> >> [ 591.968245] Tick Device: mode: 0
> >> [ 591.971801] Per CPU device: 1
> >> [ 591.974746] Clock Event Device: mct_tick1
> >> [ 591.978750] max_delta_ns: 178956969027
> >> [ 591.982739] min_delta_ns: 1249
> >> [ 591.986037] mult: 51539608
> >> [ 591.989681] shift: 32
> >> [ 591.992806] mode: 3
> >> [ 591.995848] next_event: 453685000000 nsecs
> >> [ 592.000353] set_next_event: exynos4_tick_set_next_event
> >> [ 592.005648] set_mode: exynos4_tick_set_mode
> >> [ 592.010421] event_handler: tick_handle_periodic
> >> [ 592.015115] retries: 0
> >> [ 592.018145]
> >>
> >> After turning off the CPU1, the MCT L1 local timer was disabled but the
> >> interrupt was not cleared. Turning on the CPU1 enabled the IRQ
> >> with setup_irq() but, before setting affinity to CPU1, the pending L1 timer
> >> interrupt was processed by CPU0 in exynos4_mct_tick_isr().
> >>
> >> The ISR then called event handler which set up the next timer event for
> >> current CPU (CPU0). Therefore the MCT L1 timer wasn't actually started.
> >>
> >> Fix the stall by:
> >> 1. Setting next timer event not on current CPU but on the CPU indicated
> >> by cpumask in 'clock_event_device'.
> >> 2. Clearing the timer interrupt upon stopping the local timer.
> >>
> >> The patch also moves around the call to exynos4_mct_tick_stop() but this
> >> is done only for the code readability as it is not essential for the fix.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> index 48f76bc05da0..0b49b09dd1a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> @@ -339,7 +339,14 @@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_start(unsigned long cycles,
> >> static int exynos4_tick_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
> >> struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >> {
> >> - struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> >> + /*
> >> + * In case of hotplugging non-boot CPU, the set_next_event could be
> >> + * called on CPU0 by ISR before IRQ affinity is set to proper CPU.
> >> + * Thus for accessing proper MCT Lx timer, 'per_cpu' for cpumask
> >> + * in event must be used instead of 'this_cpu_ptr'.
> >> + */
> >> + struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = &per_cpu(percpu_mct_tick,
> >> + cpumask_first(evt->cpumask));
> >>
> >> exynos4_mct_tick_start(cycles, mevt);
> >>
> >> @@ -371,23 +378,13 @@ static inline void exynos4_tick_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> >>
> >> static int exynos4_mct_tick_clear(struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt)
> >> {
> >> - struct clock_event_device *evt = &mevt->evt;
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * This is for supporting oneshot mode.
> >> - * Mct would generate interrupt periodically
> >> - * without explicit stopping.
> >> - */
> >> - if (evt->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC)
> >> - exynos4_mct_tick_stop(mevt);
> >> -
> >> /* Clear the MCT tick interrupt */
> >> if (__raw_readl(reg_base + mevt->base + MCT_L_INT_CSTAT_OFFSET) & 1) {
> >> exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mevt->base + MCT_L_INT_CSTAT_OFFSET);
> >> return 1;
> >> - } else {
> >> - return 0;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static irqreturn_t exynos4_mct_tick_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >> @@ -395,6 +392,13 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos4_mct_tick_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >> struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = dev_id;
> >> struct clock_event_device *evt = &mevt->evt;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * This is for supporting oneshot mode.
> >> + * Mct would generate interrupt periodically
> >> + * without explicit stopping.
> >> + */
> >> + if (evt->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC)
> >> + exynos4_mct_tick_stop(mevt);
> >> exynos4_mct_tick_clear(mevt);
> >>
> >> evt->event_handler(evt);
> >> @@ -441,7 +445,10 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >>
> >> static void exynos4_local_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >> {
> >> + struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> >> +
> >> evt->set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt);
> >> + exynos4_mct_tick_clear(mevt);
> >> if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI)
> >> free_irq(evt->irq, this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick));
> >> else
> >
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
