On 15 April 2014 02:39, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
> for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
>
> It should have no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> index f99cfe2..0e19bce 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -28,18 +28,18 @@ static unsigned int locking_frequency;
>
> static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
> - int index;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *freq_table;
>
> - for (index = 0;
> - freq_table[index].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; index++)
> - if (freq_table[index].frequency == freq)
> + freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
Keep it as it was, i.e. fill freq_table during its definition. If with
addition of
pos it is crossing 80 columns, then define pos in a separate line.
> + cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, freq_table) {
> + if (pos->frequency == freq)
> break;
> + }
>
> - if (freq_table[index].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
> + if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return index;
> + return pos - freq_table;
> }
>
> static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
> --
> 1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
