Hi Alan, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> > > @@ -212,6 +212,8 @@ static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev) >> > > int rc; >> > > >> > > rc = ehci_suspend(hcd, do_wakeup); >> > > + if (rc) >> > > + return rc; >> > > >> > > if (exynos_ehci->otg) >> > > exynos_ehci->otg->set_host(exynos_ehci->otg, &hcd->self); >> > > @@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev) >> > > >> > > clk_disable_unprepare(exynos_ehci->clk); >> > > >> > > - return rc; >> > > + return 0; >> > > } >> > > >> > > static int exynos_ehci_resume(struct device *dev) >> > >> > The first hunk of this patch is correct, but the second hunk isn't >> > needed. A similar remark is true for the ehci-platform patch. >> >> Hi Alan, >> >> Do you mean the following? >> >> 1st hunk >> + if (rc) >> + return rc; >> >> 2nd hunk >> - return rc; >> + return 0; > > Yes, that's what I mean. > >> Currently, the 'rc' will be always 'zero'; however, I don't >> Have any objection, because the code might be modified later. > > Exactly. We should add the new "if" statement but leave the "return > rc" the way it is. Sure, i will update both the patches. > > Alan Stern > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |