Re: [PATCH V3 14/17] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move the boot vector in pm.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,

On 08.04.2014 14:19, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
As usual, move the boot vector setting in the pm.c file and use the cpu_pm
notifier to set it up.

Remove the unused headers.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c |   23 -----------------------
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c      |   15 +++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
index 44d169b..4b94181 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@ -8,46 +8,23 @@
   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  */

-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
  #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
  #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/export.h>
-#include <linux/time.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>

  #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/suspend.h>
-#include <asm/unified.h>
  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>

  #include <plat/cpu.h>
-#include <plat/pm.h>
-
-#include <mach/map.h>

  #include "common.h"
-#include "regs-pmu.h"
-
-#define REG_DIRECTGO_ADDR	(samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
-			S5P_INFORM7 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
-			(S5P_VA_SYSRAM + 0x24) : S5P_INFORM0))
-#define REG_DIRECTGO_FLAG	(samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
-			S5P_INFORM6 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
-			(S5P_VA_SYSRAM + 0x20) : S5P_INFORM1))

  static int idle_finisher(unsigned long flags)
  {
-
-	__raw_writel(virt_to_phys(s3c_cpu_resume), REG_DIRECTGO_ADDR);
-	__raw_writel(S5P_CHECK_AFTR, REG_DIRECTGO_FLAG);
-
  	/* Set value of power down register for aftr mode */
  	exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(SYS_AFTR);
-
  	cpu_do_idle();
-
  	return 1;
  }

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
index 90fb692..e4ecd8c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
@@ -172,6 +172,20 @@ static void __init exynos5_core_down_clk(void)
  	__raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_PWR_CTRL2);
  }

+#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
+			S5P_INFORM7 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
+			(S5P_VA_SYSRAM + 0x24) : S5P_INFORM0))
+
+#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
+			S5P_INFORM6 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
+			(S5P_VA_SYSRAM + 0x20) : S5P_INFORM1))
+
+static void exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(void)
+{
+	__raw_writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume), EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR);
+	__raw_writel(S5P_CHECK_AFTR, EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG);

S5P_CHECK_AFTR is a value specific for AFTR state. I wonder if it wouldn't be desired to let the cpuidle driver somehow affect the value written here.

+}
+
  static int exynos_cpu_suspend(unsigned long arg)
  {
  #ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
@@ -387,6 +401,7 @@ static int exynos_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
  			exynos_cpu_save_register();
  			exynos_set_wakeupmask();
  		}
+		exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector();

Why this is outside of the if above? Should this really be called for all CPUs?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux