On 04/07/2014 11:51 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 4 April 2014 19:13, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 1 -
drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 7 +++++++
drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
.../cpuidle.c => drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c | 0
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c => drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c (100%)
This driver now references platform header file (plat/cpu.h) for some
Exynos5440 specific check
which is not good considering multiplatform support. Any plan to get
rid of this?
Yes. Prevent to register the platform device for this board and remove
these lines in the driver.
What is the benefit of having a single state WFI cpuidle driver ? That
pulls all the governor computation and decision for nothing.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
