Re: [PATCHv2 4/8] devfreq: exynos4: Fix bug of resource leak and code clean on probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chanwoo,

On 13.03.2014 09:17, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
This patch fix bug about resource leak when happening probe fail and code clean
to add debug message.

Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
index a2a3a47..152a3e9 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
@@ -1152,8 +1152,11 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot determine the device id %d\n", data->type);
  		err = -EINVAL;
  	}
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Cannot initialize busfreq table %d\n",
+			     data->type);
  		return err;
+	}

  	rcu_read_lock();
  	opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(dev,
@@ -1176,7 +1179,7 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	if (IS_ERR(data->devfreq)) {
  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devfreq device\n");
  		err = PTR_ERR(data->devfreq);
-		goto err_opp;
+		goto err_devfreq;
  	}

  	/*
@@ -1185,18 +1188,35 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	 */
  	busfreq_mon_reset(data);

-	devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
+	/* Register opp_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
+	err = devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register opp notifier\n");
+		goto err_notifier_opp;
+	}

+	/* Register pm_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
  	err = register_pm_notifier(&data->pm_notifier);
  	if (err) {
  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup pm notifier\n");
-		devfreq_remove_device(data->devfreq);
-		return err;
+		goto err_notifier_pm;
  	}

  	return 0;

-err_opp:
+err_notifier_pm:
+	devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
+err_notifier_opp:
+	/*
+	 * The devfreq_remove_device() would execute finally devfreq->profile
+	 * ->exit(). To avoid duplicate resource free operation, return directly
+	 * before executing resource free below 'err_devfreq' goto statement.
+	 */

I'm not quite sure about this. I believe that in this case devfreq->profile->exit() would be exynos4_bus_exit() and all it does is devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq), so all remaining resources (regulators, clocks, etc.) would get leaked.

I believe the correct thing to do would be to remove the .exit() callback from exynos4_devfreq_profile struct and handle all the clean-up here in error path.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux