On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:44:33AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/13/2014 11:40 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> > When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells + >> > #interrupt-cells for the parent interrupt controller. For the ARM GIC >> > address-cells should be 0 as this is not used. >> > >> > This patch fixes the example by correctly specifying #address-cells = 0. >> >> If the #address-cells property is required (well, or even optional...) >> in the node, shouldn't it be included in the list of required/optional >> properties above, and not solely included in the example? > > AFAIK, #address-cells = 0 is the same as not including a > #address-cells at all. > > Omitting entirely is what other interrupt-controller bindings are > doing, so I'd just drop mention of #address-cells completely. Correct. Just drop it. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |