On 13.03.2014 06:06, Rahul Sharma wrote:
On 13 March 2014 06:28, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/13/2014 12:16 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
[snip]
+ clocks {
+ compatible = "simple-bus";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
Even though you added #address-cells property I can not see "reg" property
in any of "fixed-clock".
Isn't it better either we can remove this or add "reg" property?
Also all these fixed-clock are missing #clock-cells property.
Since it is a soc level addition, I enabled provision for adding reg
property for
fixed clocks in boards files (or in SoC file).
All sub-nodes should follow the same pattern.
After recent discussion with DT people, the conclusion is that
simple-bus should be used only for MMIO platform devices with "reg"
values mapped directly into address space in which the simple-bus node
resides.
So for now I'd remove the grouping and keep the clocks in "soc" node
directly.
[snip]
+
+ dptx_phy_ch0: phyclk_dptx_phy_ch0_txd {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ clock-frequency = <270000000>;
+ clock-output-names =
"phyclk_dptx_phy_ch0_txd_clk";
+ };
I'm not sure whether these clocks are really fixed clocks. They are
output from certain PHY blocks which are not always-on, while using the
fixed clock binding would suggest otherwise. IMHO they should be hidden
inside the clock driver, without DT IDs assigned as a temporary hack,
until proper support gets added for them (e.g. proper clock provider
from appropriate PHY).
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
