Hi Arun, > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunkk.samsung@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arun > Kumar K > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:26 AM > > From: Pawel Osciak <posciak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently, for formats that are not H264, MFC driver will check the > consumed stream size returned by the firmware and, based on that, will > try to decide whether the bitstream buffer contained more than one > frame. If the size of the buffer is larger than the consumed stream, it > assumes that there are more frames in the buffer and that the buffer > should be resubmitted for decode. This rarely works though and actually > introduces problems, because: > > - v7 firmware will always return consumed stream size equal to whatever > the driver passed to it when running decode (which is the size of the > whole buffer), which means we will never try to resubmit, because the > firmware will always tell us that it consumed all the data we passed to > it; This does sound like a hardware bug/feature. So in v7 the buffer is never resubmitted, yes? And this patch makes no difference for v7? > > - v6 firmware will return the number of consumed bytes, but will not > include the padding ("stuffing") bytes that are allowed after the frame > in VP8. Since there is no way of figuring out how many of those bytes > follow the frame without getting the frame size from IVF headers (or > somewhere else, but not from the stream itself), the driver tries to > guess that padding size is not larger than 4 bytes, which is not always > true; How about v5 of MFC? I need to do some additional testing, as I don't want to introduce any regressions. I remember that this check was a result of a fair amount of work and testing with v5. > The only way to make it work is to queue only one frame per buffer from > userspace and the check in the kernel is useless and wrong for VP8. > MPEG4 still seems to require it, so keep it only for that format. Is your goal to give more than one frame in a single buffer and have the buffer resubmitted? Or the opposite - you are getting the frame resubmitted without the need? By the contents of this patch I guess the latter, on the other hand I do remember that at some point the idea was to be able to queue more than one frame per buffer. I don't remember exactly who was opting for the ability to queue more frames in a single buffer... Best wishes, -- Kamil Debski Samsung R&D Institute Poland > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak <posciak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c > b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c > index e2aac59..66c1775 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c > @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static void s5p_mfc_handle_frame(struct s5p_mfc_ctx > *ctx, > list); > ctx->consumed_stream += s5p_mfc_hw_call(dev->mfc_ops, > get_consumed_stream, dev); > - if (ctx->codec_mode != S5P_MFC_CODEC_H264_DEC && > + if (ctx->codec_mode == S5P_MFC_CODEC_MPEG4_DEC && > ctx->consumed_stream + STUFF_BYTE < > src_buf->b->v4l2_planes[0].bytesused) { > /* Run MFC again on the same buffer */ > -- > 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |