On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >> >> hold >> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >> >> they'll be >> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> > >> > >> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK >> my >> > own patches. ;) >> > >> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> > >> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) >> >> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the >> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, >> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. >> > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's > response. > > BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html