On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 12:46 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Add of_compatible strings for S5M8767 RTC, S5M8767 clock and S2MPS14
> > clock MFD cells.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > index d163c66edebb..e8ac2e3c1f58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > @@ -57,8 +57,10 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = {
> > .name = "s5m8767-pmic",
> > }, {
> > .name = "s5m-rtc",
> > + .of_compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-rtc",
> > }, {
> > .name = "s5m8767-clk",
> > + .of_compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-clk",
> > }
> > };
> >
> > @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = {
> > .name = "s2mps14-rtc",
> > }, {
> > .name = "s2mps14-clk",
> > + .of_compatible = "samsung,s2mps14-clk",
> > }
> > };
>
> Any reason for not applying compatible strings for the other devices?
Partially yes because I do not want to add them for devices which I
cannot test (s5m8761, s5m8763) but you're right that there are no
obstacles for s2mps11, s5m8767 and s2mps14.
I'll fix this in next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
