Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: sec-core: Add of_compatible strings for MFD cells

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 12:46 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Add of_compatible strings for S5M8767 RTC, S5M8767 clock and S2MPS14
> > clock MFD cells.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-core.c |    3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > index d163c66edebb..e8ac2e3c1f58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > @@ -57,8 +57,10 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = {
> >  		.name = "s5m8767-pmic",
> >  	}, {
> >  		.name = "s5m-rtc",
> > +		.of_compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-rtc",
> >  	}, {
> >  		.name = "s5m8767-clk",
> > +		.of_compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-clk",
> >  	}
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = {
> >  		.name = "s2mps14-rtc",
> >  	}, {
> >  		.name = "s2mps14-clk",
> > +		.of_compatible = "samsung,s2mps14-clk",
> >  	}
> >  };
> 
> Any reason for not applying compatible strings for the other devices?

Partially yes because I do not want to add them for devices which I
cannot test (s5m8761, s5m8763) but you're right that there are no
obstacles for s2mps11, s5m8767 and s2mps14.

I'll fix this in next version.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux