On 24 February 2014 05:51, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/27/13 19:38, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS4_DT does not exist. Use ARCH_EXYNOS4 instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat<sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >> b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >> index dbe1f1c47bb0..dff01ecf78cc 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y >> CONFIG_S3C_LOWLEVEL_UART_PORT=3 >> CONFIG_S3C24XX_PWM=y >> +CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5=y >> -CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS4_DT=y >> CONFIG_SMP=y >> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8 >> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y > > > Well, this is not required because it should be fine without this change. > ARCH_EXYNOS4 will be selected when ARCH_EXYNOS is enabled and non-exist > CONFIG (MACH_EXYNOS4_DT) will be ignored. Functionally this might not be needed as Exynos4 is selected by default. However, I don't see any point in retaining non-existent symbols. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |