My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf() could overflow. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c index ed49b25fa552..a6ee6d7cd63f 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt) mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt); mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu); - sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu); + snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu); evt->name = mevt->name; evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |