On 25 February 2014 06:22, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> >> On 02/24/14 21:03, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> >>> On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa<t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go >>>>>>>> ahead with the >>>>>>>> following steps as an initial approach: >>>>>>>> 1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files, >>>>>>>> mach-exynos-dt.c. >>>>>>>> 2. Introduce a generic compatible string "samsung,exynos". >> >> >> Well, I think, we need to consider to use compatible string >> "samsung,exynos" again because "exynos" name can be used on ARMv8 as >> well and I don't want to say that generic/common something is always >> good. So IMHO still using exynos4 and exynos5 would be better. > > > You can create a new compatible string (e.g. "samsung,exynos-armv8") for > ARMv8 Exynos if support for one in mainline shows up and/or simply use > another name for ARMv7 Exynos (e.g. "samsung,exynos-armv7"). I think "samsung,exynos-armv7" would be better in case we need to distinguish between v7 and v8. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |