Re: [PATCH 02/12] dt-bindings: document s3c24xx controller for external clock output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 16.02.2014 21:33, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. Februar 2014, 02:54:40 schrieb Tomasz Figa:
Hi Heiko,

On 13.12.2013 13:59, Heiko Stübner wrote:
The clock settings are distributed over a regular register and parts
of the misccr register.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
---

   .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt        |   53
   ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt>
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt new
file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a1f7b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+* Samsung S3C24XX External Clock Output Controller
+
+The S3C24XX series can generate clock signals on two clock output pads.
+The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in
+the s3c24x family.
+
+Required Properties:
+
+- compatible: should be one of the following.
+  - "samsung,s3c2410-dclk" - controller in S3C2410 SoCs.
+  - "samsung,s3c2412-dclk" - controller in S3C2412 SoCs.
+  - "samsung,s3c2440-dclk" - controller in S3C2440 and S3C2442 SoCs.
+  - "samsung,s3c2443-dclk" - controller in S3C2443 and later SoCs.
+- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
mapped
+  region.
+- #clock-cells: should be 1.
+- samsung,misccr: phandle to the syscon managing the misccr register,
which +  holds configuration settings for different soc-components
(clocks, usb, ...).
Hmm, looking at the datasheet, DCLK and CLKOUT registers seem to be part
of the pin controller. I wonder if there is really a need for different
driver and device node to handle them.

Could this be simply made a part of the s3c24xx pinctrl driver,
extending it to register also a clock provider under the same DT node?

it could, but of course the non-dt platforms would not be able to use it in
this case.

Hmm, that's true.

So I guess, we could get rid of this dt binding, implement the clkout handling
in the pinctrl driver for dt platforms, but use the platform-driver this
binding described for the time we're still handling non-dt s3c24xx machines.

I guess you could make this a separate driver that would be instantiated by pinctrl driver registering another platform device in DT case and a static platform device registered by board files in non-DT case.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux