On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> >>> >>> The overhead of building one more device tree isn't very large, and I >>> don't see any other need to have a Kconfig entry per SoC at this time. >>> It's of course up to Catalin, but you might just want to always >>> compile all dts files instead. >> >> For arm64, I thought of getting rid of ARCH_* Kconfig entries entirely, >> only that I haven't heard any strong opinion either way (in which case >> I'll do it, with a risk of single Image getting bigger and bigger and >> people needing smaller Image can trim their .config). > > One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared between arm and arm64 that depend on it. We already converted some of them (those depending on ARCH_VEXPRESS) to just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I’d like to see them as defaulting to modules but I don’t think we are there yet (we had some discussions at the last KS, I’m not sure anyone started looking into this).-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |