On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 09:07 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > The S2MPS11 RTC has two alarms: alarm0 and alarm1 (corresponding > > > interrupts are named similarly). Use consistent names for interrupts to > > > limit possible errors. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 8 ++++---- > > > include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 4 ++-- > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > <snip> > > > > > #define S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC60S_MASK (1 << 0) > > > #define S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1_MASK (1 << 1) > > > -#define S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA2_MASK (1 << 2) > > > +#define S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0_MASK (1 << 2) > > > > This doesn't look correct to me. > > It is just renaming RTCA2 to RTCA0 because there is no "alarm 2" > registers. Actually the behavior of driver does not change (especially > that there is no RTC driver for S2MPS11) but now it looks properly: > - set ALARM0 registers for RTCA0 interrupt, > - set ALARM1 registers for RTCA1 interrupt, > > This patch is not essential. I mean the logic. If these masks are used for registers then I assume RTCA0 would be BIT(1) amd RTCA1 would be BIT(2), but this patch swaps them round. > > > #define S2MPS11_IRQ_SMPL_MASK (1 << 3) > > > #define S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC1S_MASK (1 << 4) > > > #define S2MPS11_IRQ_WTSR_MASK (1 << 5) > > > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |