On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:50:01AM +0000, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: > Hello Mark, > > On 10 February 2014 16:03, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:42:34PM +0000, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > >> On Exynos5420 the TMU(4) for GPU has a seperate clock enable bit from > >> the other TMU channels(0 ~ 3). Hence, accessing TRIMINFO for base_second > >> should be acompanied by enabling the respective clock. > >> > >> This patch which allow for a "clk_sec" clock to be specified in the > >> device-tree which will be ungated when accessing the TRIMINFO register. > > > > Missing binding document update? Or was "clk_sec" originally in the > > binding but unused? > > > > The code seems to expect "tmu_apbif_sec" as the clock name in the DT, > > but this isn't mentioned in the commit message. > > > > I grepped Documentation/devicetree in mainline, but found no reference > > of either. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark. > This CL is to be abandoned. Ok. > > As mentioned in the previous replies to this patch. > The changes in this patched were merged with > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html > > The latest patch set can be found at. > 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15163.html > 2. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15164.html > 3. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html > 4. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html I responded here because of your ping message on 2014-02-07. The latest patches seem to have been posted before that. Was the ping misplaced or have I misunderstood? Thanks, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |