Hi Nishanth, > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Okay, thanks. Initially it looked like adding boost frequencies into > > operating-modes would convolute it but I guess I was wrong. So I > > will add support for looking up "boost-frequencies" property in > > dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table function and mark the frequencies > > listed in this binding as CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ. > I wonder if it is high time that we pop the cpufreq stuff out of opp.c > other frameworks such as devfreq might choose to do things > differently. In my opinion, conceptually cpufreq's voltage and freq handling code fits perfectly to OPP framework. Yes. We can think about excluding cpufreq related code to e.g. opp-cpufreq.c (and probably opp-devfreq.c if needed in the future). > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |