Re: [PATCH] clk: Correct handling of NULL clk in __clk_{get, put}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 January 2014 15:34, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/01/14 05:44, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Sylwester,
>>
>> On 7 January 2014 17:33, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ensure clk->kref is dereferenced only when clk is not NULL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Hi Sachin,
>>>
>>> please try if this patch fixes the exyno5420 boot crash.
>>
>> Confirmed that this patch works fine on 5420 as well as already
>> working 4210 and 5250 boards.
>> Thanks for the quick fix.
>>
>> Tested-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Sachin. Mike, it seems we need this patch on top of
> my clk-unregister branch. Sorry for overlooking this issue.
> Could you add the $subject patch to your clk-next tree ?

Gentle ping Mike. Hope we can have this patch in rc-2.

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux