On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thank you for your review comments.
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Manish,
> >
> >
> > On 26.01.2014 08:15, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> >>
> >> Instead of "#if define CONFIG_OF" use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)"
> >> option for DT code to avoid if-deffery in code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> :100644 100644 b4513f2... d353fbc... M drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> >> drivers/power/max8925_power.c | 14 +++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> >> index b4513f2..d353fbc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> >> @@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int max8925_deinit_charger(struct max8925_power_info *info)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >> static struct max8925_power_pdata *
> >> max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> @@ -468,13 +467,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >> return pdata;
> >> }
> >> -#else
> >> -static struct max8925_power_pdata *
> >> -max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> -{
> >> - return pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >> -}
> >> -#endif
> >>
> >> static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> @@ -483,7 +475,11 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> struct max8925_power_info *info;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> - pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
> >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> >> + pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
> >> + else
> >> + pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >> +
> >
> >
> > This does not look much better than before this patch. Instead of "if-deffery" outside function bodies you are adding "iffery" (if there is such a word) inside a function.
> > What about adding
> >
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> > return pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >
> > on top of max8925_power_dt_init() instead or maybe also renaming this function to max8925_get_pdata()?
>
> Okay, I will rename function "max8925_power_dt_init()" to "max8925_get_pdata()".
> As you suggested, in the body of this function will add a logic to
> retrieve data in case
> of DT and non-DT platforms.
Should we not always favor platform-supplied data regardless of
CONFIG_OF state and fall back to DT (firmware) supplied data if platform
data is absent? This way one can tweak kernel behavior without needing
to change firmware.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
