On Saturday 11 of January 2014 20:42:42 Tomasz Figa wrote: > Up till now there was no single generic method to bind devices to their > power domains using Device Tree. Each platform has been doing this using > its own way, example of which are Exynos power domain bindings [1] and > look-up code [2]. > > This series is intended to change this and provide generic DT bindings for > power domain specification and generic code performing look-up of power > domains and binding them to devices. > > Patches 1, 2, 3 are not directly related to this series, but they are > dependencies of further patches making mach-s3c64xx a user of introduced > code. Patch 4 is the most important part of this series, as it's the one > introducing $subject. Further patches are fixing and adding two users, > mach-exynos (removing the legacy code) and mach-s3c64xx (no DT support for > power domains before). Last two patches are adding display support for > Mini6410 board, including a node for display controller (FIMD) which is > a power domain consumer. > > Successfully tested on S3C6410-based Mini6410 board. > I left the references for the end of this cover letter and finally forgot about them. Please accept my apologies ;). [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt [2] arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c Also it might be good to mention that I was heavily inspired by implementation of clock providers in Common Clock Framework in case of provider registration and look-up and also by my Exynos power domain implementation (now removed by this series ;)) in case of code binding devices to power domains. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |