Hello Tomasz,
Thanks for time and review comments they are really helping me a lot
in getting the patches merged.
Secondly, accept my apologies for not giving proper writeup of why i
din't address
few of your comments on v1 of this patchset.
On 9 January 2014 19:44, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
>
> On 09.01.2014 05:59, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds device tree support to the s5p-sss.c crypto driver.
>> Implements a varient struct to address the changes in SSS hardware
>> on various SoCs from Samsung.
>>
>> Also, Documentation under devicetree/bindings added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vzapolskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
>> TO: <linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: <linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Added description of the SSS module in Documentation
>> 2. Corrected the interrupts description
>> 3. Added varient struct instead of the version variable
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/samsung-sss.txt | 20 +++++
>> drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 81
>> ++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/samsung-sss.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/samsung-sss.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/samsung-sss.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0e45b0d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/samsung-sss.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +Samsung SoC SSS (Security SubSystem) module
>> +
>> +The SSS module in S5PV210 SoC supports the following:
>> +-- Feeder (FeedCtrl)
>> +-- Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
>> +-- Data Encryption Standard (DES)/3DES
>> +-- Public Key Accelerator (PKA)
>> +-- SHA-1/SHA-256/MD5/HMAC (SHA-1/SHA-256/MD5)/PRNG
>> +-- PRNG: Pseudo Random Number Generator
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible : Should contain entries for this and backward compatible
>> + SSS versions:
>> + - "samsung,s5p-secss" for S5PV210 SoC.
>
>
> As I wrote in my previous reply, please use specific compatible string
> containing name of SoC on which the block described by it appeared first.
> Let me say it again, for security block that showed up first on S5PV210 the
> string will be "samsung,s5pv210-secss".
1. .name = "s5p-secss", is the name used in the present driver.
So, i dint modify that.
2. I'm not sure which one is the first soc to have the new varient.
May be Exynos4210. Will modify in the next version.
>
>
>> +- reg : Offset and length of the register set for the module
>> +- interrupts : the interrupt-specifier for the SSS module.
>> + Two interrupts "feed control and hash" in case of S5PV210
>> +- clocks : the required gating clock for the SSS module.
>> +- clock-names : the gating clock name to be requested in the SSS driver.
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
>> index 93cddeb..78e0c37 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/crypto.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>
>> @@ -145,6 +146,20 @@
>> #define AES_KEY_LEN 16
>> #define CRYPTO_QUEUE_LEN 1
>>
>> +/**
>> + * struct samsung_aes_varient - platform specific SSS driver data
>
>
> typo: s/varient/variant/g
>
> Anyway, I think this should be moved to the patch adding support for
> Exynos5, as before it there is no use for this struct and it's not directly
> related to DT support.
>
>
>> + * @has_hash_irq: true if SSS module uses hash interrupt, false otherwise
>> + * @aes_offset: AES register offset from SSS module's base.
>> + *
>> + * Specifies platform specific configuration of SSS module.
>> + * Note: A structure for driver specific platform data is used for future
>> + * expansion of its usage.
>> + */
>> +struct samsung_aes_varient {
>> + bool has_hash_irq;
>> + unsigned int aes_offset;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct s5p_aes_reqctx {
>> unsigned long mode;
>> };
>> @@ -173,10 +188,56 @@ struct s5p_aes_dev {
>> struct crypto_queue queue;
>> bool busy;
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> +
>> + struct samsung_aes_varient *varient;
>> };
>>
>> static struct s5p_aes_dev *s5p_dev;
>>
>> +static struct samsung_aes_varient s5p_aes_data = {
>
>
> Remember to mark constant data as const.
>
>
>> + .has_hash_irq = true,
>> + .aes_offset = 0x4000,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct platform_device_id s5p_sss_ids[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "s5p-secss",
>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5p_aes_data,
>> + },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, s5p_sss_ids);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +static const struct of_device_id s5p_sss_dt_match[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "samsung,s5p-secss",
>> + .data = (void *)&s5p_aes_data,
>
>
> No need to cast pointers to (void *) explicitly.
>
>
>> + },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s5p_sss_dt_match);
>> +#else
>> +static struct of_device_id s5p_sss_dt_match[] = {
>> + { },
>> +};
>
>
> Hmm, I don't think there is any need for this.
I think all Exynos4 and Exynos5 now supports DT
But, i'm not sure of the S5PV210 series.
>
>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static inline struct samsung_aes_varient *find_s5p_sss_version
>> + (struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
>> + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
>
>
> What about using a single if, as follows:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IF) && pdev->dev.of_node)
>
>
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> + match = of_match_node(s5p_sss_dt_match,
>
>
> You can use of_match_ptr(s5p_sss_dt_match) instead of referring to the table
> directly to eliminate the need for empty table.
>
>
>> + pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + return (struct samsung_aes_varient *)match->data;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return (struct samsung_aes_varient *)
>> + platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void s5p_set_dma_indata(struct s5p_aes_dev *dev, struct
>> scatterlist *sg)
>> {
>> SSS_WRITE(dev, FCBRDMAS, sg_dma_address(sg));
>> @@ -564,6 +625,7 @@ static int s5p_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct s5p_aes_dev *pdata;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct resource *res;
>> + struct samsung_aes_varient *varient;
>>
>> if (s5p_dev)
>> return -EEXIST;
>> @@ -580,6 +642,8 @@ static int s5p_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> resource_size(res), pdev->name))
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> + varient = find_s5p_sss_version(pdev);
>> +
>> pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "secss");
>> if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk)) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to find secss clock source\n");
>> @@ -606,18 +670,21 @@ static int s5p_aes_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> }
>>
>
> The if (variant->has_hash_irq) should start here and cover the whole block
> handling second interrupt. This should be more readable.
Indeed it is, But, adding extra tab was causing more lines to cross 80char limit
so, I used it this way.. Will modify in the next version.
>
>
>> pdata->irq_hash = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
>> - if (pdata->irq_hash < 0) {
>> + if (varient->has_hash_irq && pdata->irq_hash < 0) {
>> err = pdata->irq_hash;
>> dev_warn(dev, "hash interrupt is not available.\n");
>> goto err_irq;
>> }
>> - err = devm_request_irq(dev, pdata->irq_hash, s5p_aes_interrupt,
>> - IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, pdev);
>> - if (err < 0) {
>> - dev_warn(dev, "hash interrupt is not available.\n");
>> - goto err_irq;
>> + if (varient->has_hash_irq) {
>> + err = devm_request_irq(dev, pdata->irq_hash,
>> s5p_aes_interrupt,
>> + IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, pdev);
>> + if (err < 0) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "hash interrupt is not
>> available.\n");
>> + goto err_irq;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> + pdata->varient = varient;
>> pdata->dev = dev;
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
>> s5p_dev = pdata;
>> @@ -674,9 +741,11 @@ static int s5p_aes_remove(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> static struct platform_driver s5p_aes_crypto = {
>> .probe = s5p_aes_probe,
>> .remove = s5p_aes_remove,
>> + .id_table = s5p_sss_ids,
>> .driver = {
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .name = "s5p-secss",
>> + .of_match_table = s5p_sss_dt_match,
>
>
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(s5p_sss_dt_match),
I dint use it, Some time back there was a patchset from Sachin
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/28/61
Please suggest me on this.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
