On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 13:54:32 Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-01-08 10:04:57) > > On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote: > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44) > > > > > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such > > > > > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock > > > > > series as pull requests. > > > > > > > > Me? I haven't applied any clk patches. > > > > > > I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > I can take patch #8 as > > > well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc? > > > > Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since > > it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up > > for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through... > > In the absence of any strong opinion on the topic I have taken patch #8 > into clk-next for 3.14. Great, thanks. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |